Skip to main content

Midterm Examination

English 9 Midterm Examination

Cumulative assessment after Units 1–6.

Assessment Home

Reading Passage

This passage was written for this course and may be printed with the assessment.

A public speech is often judged by the strength of its conclusion, but conclusions earn their force earlier. A speaker first establishes the situation: who must decide, what is at stake, and why the moment requires attention. Next, the speaker selects evidence suited to the audience. A technical report may persuade engineers, while a concrete example may help a general audience understand the same problem. Responsible persuasion also makes room for resistance. A speaker who ignores a serious objection may sound confident, yet the argument remains fragile. By stating an opposing concern accurately, the speaker demonstrates understanding. By conceding what is true in that concern, the speaker gains credibility. Only then can a rebuttal show why the original claim still stands or must be qualified. Style matters, but style cannot repair broken reasoning. Repetition can make a sentence memorable; it cannot make weak evidence sufficient. Emotional language can make listeners care; it cannot establish that a claim is factual. The most durable public voice joins ethical purpose, tested evidence, logical movement, and language shaped for listeners.

Objective Questions

1. What is the passage’s central claim?

A. A strong conclusion is the only important part of a speech. B. Responsible persuasion combines rhetorical situation, suitable evidence, fair treatment of objections, sound reasoning, and purposeful style. C. Emotional language should never be used. D. Technical reports are always more persuasive than examples.

2. How does paragraph two develop the argument?

A. It gives a historical example. B. It explains why accurate engagement with opposition strengthens an argument. C. It claims that objections should be ignored. D. It compares poetry and speech.

3. The word “fragile” suggests that the argument is

A. delicate because it lacks support B. beautifully worded C. offensive to listeners D. too technical to understand

4. Which statement would the author most likely agree with?

A. Memorable style can substitute for evidence. B. A concession admits that the entire opposing argument is correct. C. Different audiences may require different forms of evidence. D. A speaker should never qualify a claim.

5. What relationship does the final paragraph establish?

A. Style and reasoning are identical. B. Style can strengthen sound reasoning but cannot replace it. C. Reasoning matters only in technical reports. D. Emotion always weakens public speech.

6. Which sentence contains effective parallel structure?

A. The speaker investigated the issue, tested the evidence, and revised the claim. B. The speaker investigated the issue, testing evidence, and the claim was revised. C. The speaker was investigating, evidence was tested, and revising the claim. D. The issue was investigated, to test evidence, and revision.

7. Which transition best signals concession?

A. For example B. Admittedly C. Therefore D. Similarly

8. Which is an example of a rebuttal?

A. Some residents worry about cost. B. The project will cost money. C. Although the cost concern is valid, the capped repair budget prevents an open-ended obligation. D. Cost is a topic.

9. Which evidence would best support a claim about library use?

A. A verified count of visits over twelve months B. One person’s guess C. A decorative photograph D. An unrelated national statistic

10. Which sentence is punctuated correctly?

A. The claim was memorable however, the evidence was weak. B. The claim was memorable; however, the evidence was weak. C. The claim was memorable, however the evidence was weak. D. The claim; was memorable however the evidence was weak.

11. Which word best describes the author’s tone?

A. Analytical B. Sarcastic C. Panicked D. Nostalgic

12. Which summary is most accurate?

A. Speeches should be emotional and brief. B. Effective speeches depend on conclusions. C. Durable persuasion requires attention to audience, evidence, opposition, reasoning, and style. D. Engineers dislike concrete examples.

Not scored

Written responses require teacher review.

Writing Task

Write a 700–900-word rhetorical analysis explaining how the author develops the idea of responsible persuasion. Analyze organization, evidence, treatment of opposition, and style.

Planning or response space

Use the appropriate course rubric. A complete response must make a defensible claim, use precise evidence, explain reasoning, and demonstrate language control.