Science of Evidence · Offline model laboratory

Motion Model Detective

When does a straight-line model fit a set of position measurements, and when is a constant-acceleration curve more defensible?

Start with the right question

Linear model: x=b+mt. Quadratic model: x=b+mt+ct². Both are fit by least squares to the first five points t=0,1,2,3,4 s. The sixth at t=5 s is held out from fitting. Residual = observed position − predicted position, with unit meters. Training RMSE = √(mean squared training residual), also in meters.

Models differ in complexity: quadratic has three parameters and may fit training data better because it is more flexible. Also examine the holdout, residual pattern and plausible motion mechanism.

1. Choose a case and make a prediction

Brown dots: invented dataTeal: linear modelGold: quadratic model

2. Compare model fits

Position (m) versus time (s); point at t=5 s is held out.

Residual = observed − predicted (m), plotted for the five training points only.

3. Study the numbers and test the prediction

Invented model-selection dataset, with time in seconds and position in meters
t (s)Measured-style synthetic x (m)Linear prediction (m)Linear residual (m)Quadratic prediction (m)Quadratic residual (m)Split

Download the supplied fictional Week 05 comparison CSV

4. Science notebook and result history

Saved model comparisons in this browser
#DatasetLinear RMSE (m)Quadratic RMSE (m)Linear holdout error (m)Quadratic holdout error (m)

5. Seven-round model detective game

Interpret randomly selected synthetic position tables, choosing the physically plausible simpler linear or accelerating quadratic model. Answer feedback explains the underlying trend. The game draws seven distinct cases from ten.

Start a seven-round investigation.

Score: 0 / 7