KHAEMENES ACADEMY · PHYSICS 12 · WEEK 17 · DAY 04

Integrated Mechanics Investigation

Use a supplied multi-stage dataset to test model transitions and conservation assumptions.

Explicit physics instruction

This investigation uses a combined motion/force/collision dataset. Students identify where the model should change, calculate predicted quantities, and compare with observed values.

Preserve raw observations before derived speed, energy, or momentum values. Each transformation should remain traceable.

A mismatch can indicate measurement uncertainty, unmodeled work, external impulse, or a poor system boundary.

Vocabulary: multi-stage data; residual; model transition; system boundary; uncertainty.

Worked example with reasoning

A cart’s predicted pre-collision speed is 2.5 m/s but measured is 2.3 m/s. The difference should be evaluated before the collision model uses 2.3 m/s as input.

Guided question

Which mismatch matters more: a pre-collision energy residual or a collision momentum residual? Explain why they test different stages.

Independent work

  1. Identify stage boundaries in the supplied dataset.
  2. Calculate one energy prediction and one momentum prediction.
  3. Compute residuals.
  4. Write one stage-specific revision.

Investigation / Data Lab

Preserve raw multi-stage data, stage boundaries, derived quantities, residuals, uncertainty, and one revision.

Misconception check

A residual should be assigned to the stage/model it tests rather than blamed on the entire experiment.

Formative understanding check

What makes a multi-stage analysis reproducible?

Reveal response

Clear stage boundaries, raw data, equations/assumptions, and traceable derived quantities.

Mentor evidence conference

Ask Archaemenes to challenge model choice, stage boundaries, and residual interpretation.

Teacher guidance

Foundation: Use a guided stage table.

Core: Analyze energy then momentum with separate residuals.

Extended: Propagate an upstream uncertainty into a downstream prediction.