Week 07 · Emotion & Motivation

Emotion–Motivation Systems

How do emotion, appraisal, goals, expectations, and context work together to shape choice?

80% Daily ReviewLocal-firstAcademic, not therapeutic
1 · Retrieval Warm-Up

Retrieval Warm-Up

Without notes, write one idea you already know that might connect to Emotion–Motivation Systems. Then write one question the lesson should help you answer.

2 · Essential Question

Essential Question

How do emotion, appraisal, goals, expectations, and context work together to shape choice?

3 · Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Students will be able to:

4 · Psychology Word of the Day

situation

Use it in context: Explain how situation connects to today’s evidence, measure, or explanation. Do not treat knowing the word as the same thing as understanding the construct.
5 · Vocabulary in Context

Vocabulary in Context

situation · appraisal · emotion · motivation · goal · self-efficacy · incentive · choice · consequence · alternative explanation · limitation

6 · Core Reading

Substantial Core Reading

Behavior rarely provides a complete explanation of itself. A person may make the same outward choice for different reasons, and different people may respond differently to the same event.

Use the week scaffold:

Situation → Appraisal → Emotion → Motivation → Choice → Consequence

Then interrogate it:

Emotion can influence attention, memory, judgment, goals, and behavior. Motivation can influence direction, effort, and persistence. Neither creates an automatic behavioral command.

7 · Worked Example

Worked Example / Synthesis

A student chooses not to join a competitive debate event.

Possible explanations include:

The outward choice alone does not reveal which explanation is correct.

8 · Scientist's Desk

Psychological Scientist's Desk

Claim: “If someone avoids a challenge, they are unmotivated.”

Students identify at least five alternatives and specify evidence that could distinguish them.

9 · Data Lens

Data Lens

Fictional dataset:

| Condition | Anticipatory arousal (1–10) | Expected success (1–10) | Choice to participate | Persistence if participating |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| A | 8 | 3 | 31% | 7.2 min |
| B | 7 | 8 | 76% | 15.4 min |
| C | 3 | 4 | 45% | 9.1 min |
| D | 4 | 8 | 82% | 16.0 min |

Students describe relationships without claiming that arousal or expected success alone determines behavior.

10 · Claims Laboratory

Claims Laboratory

Students classify and justify:

11 · Guided Investigation

Guided Investigation

Students receive three fictional cases. For each they complete:

  1. observable situation;
  2. observed behavior;
  3. possible appraisal;
  4. possible emotion;
  5. possible goal/motive;
  6. self-efficacy or expectancy factor;
  7. environmental opportunity/constraint;
  8. prior learning influence;
  9. evidence needed;
  10. strongest current conclusion;
  11. limitation;
  12. ethical wording.
11A · Extended Inquiry

Extended Inquiry from the Locked Plan

Weekly Mastery Task

Synthesize this week's learning through Emotion–Motivation Systems. Construct a concept map linking at least four course ideas, attach one example to each connection, and write a 250–350 word explanation of the strongest relationship. Include one competing explanation or limitation and one ethical safeguard.

Why Do People Do What They Do? — Emotion & Motivation Analysis

Students analyze one substantial fictional case in 700–1,000 words.

Required sections:

  1. Observation
  2. Situation and Context
  3. Appraisal
  4. Emotion Evidence
  5. Motivation and Goals
  6. Self-Efficacy / Expected Success
  7. Choice and Consequence
  8. Alternative Explanation
  9. Evidence Needed
  10. Limitation
  11. Ethical Boundary
  12. Conclusion

The student must explicitly state which claims are observed, measured, and inferred.

Research/Data Lab

Students compare two fictional conditions that alter task framing or feedback and measure:

  • self-reported emotion;
  • expected success;
  • choice;
  • persistence;
  • performance.

They identify independent/dependent variables, relationships among measures, a possible mediator, alternative explanations, and the strongest justified conclusion.

Week 7 Final Principle

Emotion informs without commanding. Motivation influences without guaranteeing. Behavior must be interpreted through evidence, context, alternatives, and limits.
12 · Independent Assignment

Independent Assignment

Write a 250–400 word evidence-based analysis applying Emotion–Motivation Systems to a fictional, public, or non-sensitive example.

13 · Research Notebook

Research Notebook Checkpoint

Update the semester model:

14 · Academic Journal

Academic Journal Reflection

Complete the sentence academically: “Understanding why a person behaves in a certain way is different from judging the person's character because…”

No personal emotional disclosure is required.

Privacy boundary: The journal is academic, not therapeutic. Fictional, public, non-sensitive, or course-supplied examples are always acceptable.
15 · Daily Review

5-question formative check

1. Which statement best captures today's central idea about Emotion–Motivation Systems?
2. Which task best matches today's Data Lens for Emotion–Motivation Systems?
3. Which response best applies Emotion–Motivation Systems to today's independent task while staying within the evidence?
4. How should the Psychological Scientist's Desk handle a strong claim about Emotion–Motivation Systems?
5. Which conclusion is most scientifically responsible after today's work on Emotion–Motivation Systems?
16 · Local Completion Record

Review status

Not yet marked reviewed
← PreviousWeek 7 Assessment →