Day 1 · What Is Psychology?
Choose a broad psychological question.
Develop one bounded research question across 13 weeks while tracking measures, alternatives, limitations, ethics, and revisions.
Choose a broad psychological question.
Add several plausible levels of explanation.
Operationalize at least two variables.
Predict a data pattern and state why correlation does not establish cause.
Complete ethics, design, limits, and conclusion.
Identify one possible biological contributor without calling it the cause.
Identify a plausible physiological measure.
State what a brain comparison would actually measure.
Consider whether sleep, alertness, or attention state matters.
Select an appropriate biological method and state a limitation.
Identify direct measurement versus inference.
Classify useful measures as sensory, behavioral, or physiological.
Identify possible expectations or interpretations.
Consider attention as mediator or alternative explanation.
Decide whether context or experience belongs in the research model.
Could learned stimulus associations plausibly contribute to the semester research question?
Could consequences or environmental contingencies plausibly maintain or change the behavior in the semester research question?
Could repeated measurement establish a useful baseline for the semester research question?
Could models, peers, observed consequences, or social norms contribute to the semester research question?
Compare all Week 4 learning explanations for the semester question.
What would participants need to notice, understand, or remember for the semester phenomenon to occur?
If the semester question involves memory, specify which kind of memory or retrieval process is actually relevant rather than using the broad word “memory.”
If participants must learn or remember something in the semester question, decide when performance should be measured: immediately, after a delay, or both.
Could retrospective self-report create a measurement problem in the semester question?
Could wording, translation, language background, or linguistic context influence how variables in the semester question are measured?
Does the semester question contain a category, construct, or judgment that needs a clearer definition?
Could availability, category expectations, anchoring, or base-rate neglect distort how participants answer or interpret the semester research question?
Audit the wording of the semester research question and any proposed survey items.
Does the semester question use a construct requiring a standardized measure?
Add a confidence rating to the current working explanation for the semester question.
If emotion is relevant to the semester research question: - define the emotional construct precisely; - identify at least two possible measures; - explain why neither measure is identical to the emotion itself.
If emotion or motivation is relevant to the semester question, ask: - Could appraisal mediate the relationship between the situation and behavior?
If motivation is relevant to the semester research question: - define the motivational construct; - identify a behavioral measure and a self-report measure; - identify at least one non-motivational factor that could affect performance.
Ask: - Could expectations of success influence the behavior in my research question?
Update the semester model: - Is emotion relevant?
Ask: - Is age or developmental stage relevant to my semester question?
If early experience or developmental history is relevant to the semester question: - specify what developmental variable would be measured; - avoid vague statements such as “childhood caused it”; - identify at least one later-life factor that could also matter.
Ask: - Could developmental differences in language, executive function, or prior knowledge affect my research question?
If the semester question involves adolescents: - identify which developmental process is actually relevant; - distinguish age from social context; - identify whether peer, family, school, or cultural variables should be measured; - state one claim that would be too deterministic.
Update the semester model: - Is development or age relevant?
Ask whether stable individual differences are relevant to the semester question.
If the semester question proposes a trait or individual-difference variable, define it as a dimension and identify how it would be measured.
Add a context audit to the semester question: - In which settings would the proposed relationship be measured?
Choose the best measurement strategy for any proposed individual-difference variable in the semester question.
Add the Week 9 individual-differences audit: - Is personality relevant to the semester question?
If social influence may affect the semester question, define the social variable precisely.
Add both a person-level and a situation-level explanation to the semester question when relevant.
If the semester question involves groups, specify whether the unit of analysis is the individual, dyad, group, classroom, organization, or community.
If a social-group variable appears in the semester project, justify why it is scientifically necessary, how it will be defined, and how the project will avoid essentializing or stigmatizing participants.
Add the Week 10 social-context audit: - Is social influence relevant to the semester question?
If stress is relevant to the semester question, define: - the stressor; - the proposed appraisal; - the response measure; - one alternative explanation.
If relevant, specify whether sleep or recovery is: - an independent variable; - dependent variable; - mediator; - moderator; - confound; - or not justified.
If coping is relevant, specify: - strategy; - target demand; - outcome measure; - actual constraints; - potential social-support variable; - one rival explanation.
Audit whether the semester question confuses: - intention with behavior; - behavior with motivation; - access with preference; - correlation with causal effect.
Add a Health Interpretation Boundary: - What can the project say about health-related behavior?
Replace any accidental diagnostic language in the semester question with measurable, non-clinical wording unless a professionally diagnosed population is actually part of the evidence.
If the semester project refers to a clinical population, identify how that population was established and one remaining source of heterogeneity.
Complete a Language & Stigma Audit of the semester project.
If the semester project discusses intervention, record the target outcome, evidence level, population, follow-up, burden, and one reason the project cannot provide personal treatment advice.
- Does the project diagnose anyone?
Identify the most realistic application of the semester question.
For the semester project, state: - the population actually represented; - the setting represented; - the strongest justified generalization; - one population or setting that remains uncertain; - whether a pilot would be appropriate before broad application.
If the semester application involves technology or persuasion, add: - target behavior; - mechanism of influence; - transparency requirement; - privacy risk; - accessibility concern; - one design alternative with less coercive pressure.
Complete the Evidence Convergence Map: - strongest evidence; - weakest evidence still retained; - conflicting evidence; - source dependency/overlap; - evidence that changed the working conclusion; - evidence still missing.
Complete the Research Integrity Audit: - What did I originally think?