Problem 1
If r>0 were smallest, then r/2 would be a smaller positive rational, a contradiction.
Faculty solution guide
Accept equivalent mathematically correct reasoning. Require definitions, proof or algorithm, edge cases, and verification.
If r>0 were smallest, then r/2 would be a smaller positive rational, a contradiction.
A common error is to rely on a plausible pattern, diagram, or program output without checking definitions, domain conditions, quantifiers, edge cases, proof obligations, or algorithm invariants.
A complete response identifies the objects, domain, definitions, notation, hypotheses, and desired conclusion for Proof by Contradiction and Counterexample.
Repair the first invalid inference, hidden overlap, counterexample, violated graph condition, recurrence assumption, or algorithm invariant; then restate the corrected conclusion.
A strong application defines the computing context, mathematical model, proof or algorithm, correctness evidence, complexity or scale, and limitations.
Use at least two of: independent enumeration, truth table, symbolic equivalence, counterexample search, induction, invariant, alternate graph traversal, brute-force test on small cases, recurrence substitution, or second algorithm.