| Assignment | Evidence | Category | Date | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit 1: Scholarly Foundations | Evidence-based analytical paragraph, revised diagnostic essay, and language conventions check. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 2: Myth and Epic | Comparative literary analysis with a visual archetype map. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 3: Narrative Craft | Polished short story with craft commentary and peer-review record. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 4: Poetry and Voice | Four-poem portfolio, comparative analysis, and formal oral reading. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 5: Drama and Consequence | Literary analysis, Socratic seminar, and staged interpretation. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 6: Rhetoric and Speech | Four-to-six-minute evidence-based speech with rhetorical analysis. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 7: Research and Media | Annotated bibliography, source audit, and 900–1,200-word research report. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 8: Informational Writing | Explanatory article, tested procedure, and accessible infographic. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 9: Novel Study | 1,200–1,500-word literary analysis and independent reading conference. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 10: Argument and Debate | 1,200–1,600-word position paper and structured debate. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 11: Publication Studio | Curated literary magazine, digital exhibit, or themed publication with editorial statement. | Major Product | |||
| Unit 12: Capstone and Defense | Portfolio, synthesis capstone, cumulative final examination, and oral defense. | Major Product | |||
| Diagnostic | Baseline objective section and analytical essay | Assessment | |||
| Midterm | Cumulative reading, language, rhetoric, and writing | Assessment | |||
| Final Examination | Cumulative objective section and synthesis argument | Assessment | |||
| Portfolio & Oral Defense | Curated artifacts, reflection, and defense | Portfolio |
Course Documentation
Gradebook
Grades should describe demonstrated learning.
Record major evidence and preserve rubric-scored work. Daily practice may inform instruction without overwhelming the final grade.
English 9 · Unit 01 · Day 15
Educator Review · Scholarly Demonstration
Score the independent writing with the original five-criterion, 10-point rubric. Record evidence-specific feedback, then preserve the evaluation in the Gradebook and as an exportable JSON file.
Local educator/parent-managed review: This publicly hosted, offline-capable tool does not authenticate reviewers or synchronize devices. Use the school’s authorized review process for official grade approval. Never use a shared public computer for private student evidence.
Day 15 Mastery Rubric · 10 Points
For each criterion, award 0 (missing), 1 (developing), or 2 (mastery). A total of 8/10 or higher meets the Day 15 threshold; below 8/10 requires targeted revision and re-evaluation.
| Criterion | Evidence to evaluate | Score (0–2) |
|---|---|---|
| Inquiry & Claim | Is the claim specific, arguable, and responsive to both texts? | |
| Evidence | Are quotations and paraphrases accurate, precise, and taken from both sources? | |
| Synthesis | Does the response produce a new understanding of a relationship among sources? | |
| Reasoning | Does analysis explain how the evidence supports or complicates the interpretation? | |
| Clarity & Conventions | Is the argument coherent and responsibly attributed, with controlled conventions? |
Choose five scores
Load the learner submission or import a backup to begin.