Unit 08 · Informational & Technical Communication · Week 24

Data, Visuals & Accessible Information

How should words and visuals divide the work of explanation?

Five complete lessons with local technical evidence, explicit instruction, printable workspaces, and evaluator-reviewed mastery.

Weekly targets

Explain accurately and accessibly

  • Use accurately: data, variable, unit, scale, caption, annotation, contrast, alternative text, accessibility.
  • Make structure, evidence boundaries, and usability visible.
  • Complete Accessible pilot infographic and 300–450-word findings brief.
  • Revise after testing and evaluator feedback.

Local communication commission · Rivermark Learning Annex

Write information people can actually use

Following the Unit 7 investigation, Rivermark authorizes a ten-day evening pilot. The student communication team must explain the pilot, write a usable check-in procedure, and report attendance accessibly.

Evidence boundary: Rivermark, its annex, and all records in this packet are course-created simulations. They support this instructional commission only and must not be represented as real public data.

Week 24 technical packet

Shared facts and constraints

Ten-day pilot attendance

DayVisitsStudents needing late transportation information
1185
2227
3258
4206
53111
6279
7248
82910
93513
103010

Known: 261 visits were recorded; daily mean 26.1 and median 26. Unknown: repeat visitors, total eligible population, long-term demand, and why transportation information was requested.

Day 116 · Required lesson

Read the data boundary

Distinguish observations, calculations, comparisons, inferences, and unknowns.

Direct instruction and model

A table records 261 visits, not necessarily 261 different students. The data describe ten pilot days and cannot prove long-term impact.

Independent evidence

Write three supported observations, two cautious inferences, and three conclusions the table cannot support. Cite exact values and units.

Day 117 · Required lesson

Choose an honest display

Match table, bar chart, line graph, or proportional display to the question.

Direct instruction and model

A table supports lookup; bars compare categories; a line emphasizes ordered change. Scales, baselines, labels, and aggregation alter interpretation.

Independent evidence

Sketch two possible displays. Select one and defend its form, axis or category choices, scale, units, and ordering.

Day 118 · Required lesson

Write titles, captions and annotations

Make each text element perform a distinct job.

Direct instruction and model

A title states the subject; labels identify variables and units; a caption gives context and boundary; an annotation directs attention to a defensible feature.

Independent evidence

Draft a title, complete labels, 40–70-word caption, and two annotations. Remove any causal language the data cannot justify.

Day 119 · Required lesson

Design for access

Ensure meaning survives without color, tiny text, hovering, or vision.

Direct instruction and model

Use readable contrast, direct labels, patterns or shapes in addition to color, logical reading order, and a concise text alternative that reports the important relationship.

Independent evidence

Create the visual and a text equivalent. Check contrast, type size, color independence, reading order, units, and print legibility.

Day 120 · Required lesson

Publish and defend

Integrate visual evidence with prose without duplicating every number.

Direct instruction and model

The findings brief should state the question, principal pattern, transportation concern, limitations, and next evidence needed. The graphic supports—not replaces—the reasoning.

Independent evidence

Submit the accessible infographic, findings brief, data-check sheet, accessibility check, revision note, and 150-word design defense.

Weekly mastery assessment

Accessible pilot infographic and 300–450-word findings brief

Submit the named product, five daily responses, fact check, meaningful revision, and reflection. Preparation and submission are not mastery.

Criterion2 · Secure1 · Developing0 · Insufficient
Accuracy and evidence boundarySpecific, accurate and completePartly demonstrated; revision requiredMissing, unusable or inaccurate
Structure and reasoningSpecific, accurate and completePartly demonstrated; revision requiredMissing, unusable or inaccurate
Audience usabilitySpecific, accurate and completePartly demonstrated; revision requiredMissing, unusable or inaccurate
Language and accessible designSpecific, accurate and completePartly demonstrated; revision requiredMissing, unusable or inaccurate
Testing, revision and reflectionSpecific, accurate and completePartly demonstrated; revision requiredMissing, unusable or inaccurate

Mastery: 8/10 after evaluator review. Below 8/10, revise the lowest criterion and resubmit. Optional tools and completion controls cannot assign the score.