Five detailed lessons, two offline scientific laboratories, seven-round games, teacher notes, complete energy ledgers and a three-constraint engineering challenge. Your original student evidence notebook remains below.
Two devices transfer the same energy in different times.
Learning target
Build an initial model and explanation for: Why can two machines do the same work at different rates?
Evidence task
Record observations, questions, an initial model, and one claim that could be tested. Use these concepts where relevant: power; efficiency; useful output; dissipation.
Tuesday
Concept & Model Revision
Study and explain the week's core ideas: power; efficiency; useful output; dissipation
Reading
Open text on power/efficiency.
Evidence task
Revise Monday's model. Add two evidence-backed annotations and explain one limitation or uncertainty.
Wednesday
Data & Quantitative Reasoning
P=E/t and percent efficiency.
Evidence task
Show units, setup, calculation or graph reasoning, then write what the quantitative evidence can and cannot establish about: Why can two machines do the same work at different rates?
Thursday
Investigation / Engineering
Human-scale stair-power calculation if safe, or dataset.
Safety boundary
Use the course safety charter. If supervision, facilities, materials, or conditions are not appropriate, use the supplied-data/simulation alternative rather than improvising hazardous procedures.
Evidence task
Record variables or design constraints, procedure/model, observations/data, and one revision you would make after reviewing the evidence.
Friday
CER / Synthesis
Answer the essential question: Why can two machines do the same work at different rates?
Mastery evidence
Submit a claim, at least two specific pieces of evidence, reasoning that connects them, one limitation/counterclaim, and a correction note for any essential concept below 80%.
Portfolio
Select one artifact from this week and explain why it is trustworthy evidence of growth.