Grade 12 · Week 13 · Friday

Present a Responsible Energy-System Proposal

Learning objective: Defend a complete conservation ledger and a design recommendation with evidence, limitations and corrections.

45–60 minutes · Digital investigation · Browser-local evidence

Scientific reading

A claim needs an explicit purpose

A strong claim identifies the device's intended useful output and states that energy input must be fully accounted for across useful, thermal, other and storage pathways. Design recommendations should refer to quantified constraints, not simply the highest efficiency number.

Pair energy accounting with engineering evidence

Use the 500 J, 60% useful, 25% thermal, 5 s case: useful output 300 J, thermal transfer 125 J, other transfer 75 J and useful power 60 W. For a competing case, use 500 J at 70% useful and 30% thermal in 5 s: useful rises to 350 J but thermal transfer becomes 150 J and fails the stated 140 J thermal constraint.

Respond to objections

Counterclaim: energy that does not become useful output has vanished. The complete ledger demonstrates where it goes in our model. Counterclaim: a higher useful efficiency guarantees that all constraints are met. One improvement can fail a different criterion. Counterclaim: this digital output describes actual product performance. Every datum is a hypothetical calculation.

Close with a revision and assessment plan

Present an improved diagram, a comparison table, two correct calculations, one evidence-based limitation, and one meaningful next test. Friday's ten randomized open-book questions are public formative checks; actual supervised midterm/final assessments and official scores belong to a separate educator-controlled process.

Vocabulary

claim–evidence–reasoning
Explanation using a claim, data and scientific principles.
engineering recommendation
Defensible choice supported by criteria and trade-off evidence.
counterclaim
Alternative explanation evaluated through evidence.
conservation ledger
Accounting identity showing input and all modeled output/storage terms.
model limitation
Missing factor constraining application beyond the exercise.

Worked example

Proposal A: E_in 500 J, 60% useful, 25% thermal, 5 s => 300 J useful, 125 J thermal, 75 J other; passes. Proposal B: 500 J, 70% useful, 30% thermal, 5 s => 350 J useful but 150 J thermal, fails.

Label useful and other pathways, numerical units and assumptions.

Student science portfolio

Produce a 20-point CER including a Sankey, data table, two model calculations, tested constraints, counterclaim correction and an explicitly safe validation proposal.

Local browser notes, portable by JSON export. No remote synchronization.

Friday · Ten Randomized Mastery Questions

Open-book formative practice and explanations. Reach 80% after corrections; supervised exams remain separate.